LATEST: Go to BirtherReport.com for the latest Article II eligibility news ...
Monday, February 28, 2011


Professor Charles Rice on Obama's 'eligibility' 
By Matt C. Abbot

There's been a lot of discussion in certain circles on the topic of President Obama's "eligibility." (Incidentally, Dr. William Oddie cogently argues in a recent commentary that Obama is an enemy of the Catholic Church. Click here to read it.)

Charles E. Rice, professor emeritus at Notre Dame Law School — and author of the book What Happened to Notre Dame? — argues that it's time for a new approach on the eligibility issue. His commentary is reprinted below.

__________________________________________________

Obama Eligibility
By Charles E. Rice

The speculation about President Obama's eligibility goes on and on, with no reliable access to the truth and with no end in sight. It is time for a new approach.

The Constitution provides: "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President." Art II, Sec. 1. Neither the Constitution nor any federal law defines the term "natural born citizen." Nor has the Supreme Court provided a definition that covers the questions presented in the Obama case.

In Minor v. Happersett, in 1875, the Supreme Court, made an incidental reference to the issue: "[N]ew citizens may be born or they may be created by naturalization. The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first." 88 U.S. 162, 167-68 (1875).

The Obama "Fight the Smears" website has published a digital photograph of a short-form "Certification of Live Birth" issued by the Hawaiian Department of Health that lists his place and date of birth as Honolulu on August 4, 1961. At that time, Hawaii's practice was to issue also a long-form Certificate of Live Birth which contains more information, including the name of the hospital, or address of the place, where the birth occurred; the identity of the physician or other "attendant" at the birth; and the signature of the parent or other 'informant" certifying the accuracy of the information, etc. President Obama has not given the permission required by Hawaiian law for release of that long-form certificate.

Numerous lawsuits challenging Obama's eligibility have been rejected by every court involved, including the Supreme Court of the United States. Some are still pending. The rejections have been based on various grounds, including the plaintiff's lack of standing to sue and other specified and unspecified procedural grounds. No court has agreed to decide any of those suits on the merits.

The lawsuits have presented a bewildering array of claims, including, among others, that: Obama was born, not in Hawaii, but Kenya; if he was born abroad, his mother, an American citizen, was legally too young to confer that citizenship on him at birth; the Hawaiian short-form certification of birth published on the Obama website is a forgery; that short-form certification could have been legally issued in 1961 to certify a birth occurring elsewhere than Hawaii; Obama is ineligible because, wherever he was born, he had dual-citizenship since his father was a British citizen and the British Nationality Act of 1948 made his son a British citizen at birth; Obama identified himself as a foreign student at Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard Law School; when Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981, he did so on an Indonesian passport at a time when Indonesian law forbade dual citizenship, etc., etc.

There is no reason to analyze those lawsuits here in detail. Their lack of success cannot be ascribed simply to a hyper-technical evasion of judicial responsibility. For example, the rule requiring a plaintiff in a federal court proceeding to have a sufficient personal interest, or standing, to bring the suit provides needed assurance that suits will be seriously contested and will seek more than merely advisory opinions. On the other hand, it is fair to say that the Obama controversy involves significant issues of fact and law that deserve some sort of official resolution.

I suggest no conclusion as to whether Obama is eligible or not. But the citizens whom the media and political pundits dismiss as "birthers" have raised legitimate questions. That legitimacy is fueled by Obama's curious, even bizarre, refusal to consent to the release of the relevant records. Perhaps there is nothing to the issues raised. Or perhaps there is. This is potentially serious business. If it turns out that Obama knew he was ineligible when he campaigned and when he took the oath as President, it could be the biggest political fraud in the history of the world. As long as Obama refuses to disclose the records, speculation will grow and grow without any necessary relation to the truth. The first step toward resolving the issue is full discovery and disclosure of the facts.

The courts are not the only entities empowered to deal with such a question. A committee of the House of Representatives could be authorized to conduct an investigation into the eligibility issue. The classic formulation of the Congressional role is Woodrow Wilson's, in his 1884 book Congressional Government:

It is the proper duty of a representative body to look diligently into every affair of government and to talk much about what it sees. It is meant to be the eyes and the voice, and to embody the wisdom and will of its constituents. Unless Congress have and use every means of acquainting itself with the acts and the disposition of the administrative agents of the government, the country must be helpless to learn how it is being served; and unless Congress both scrutinize these things and sift them by every form of discussion, the country must remain in embarrassing, crippling ignorance of the very affairs which it is most important that it should understand and direct. The informing function of Congress should be preferred even to its legislative function...[T]he only really self-governing people is that people which discusses and interrogates its administration. (p. 198)

Wilson later retreated from his affirmation of Congressional supremacy. He said in 1900 that the president, rather than Congress, "is now at the front of affairs." (Congressional Government, preface to 15th edition, 1900, p. 22.) In his 1908 book Constitutional Government in the United States, four years before he was elected to that office, he described the president as "the political leader of the nation." (pp. 67ff.) Wilson's second thoughts on congressional supremacy, however, do not negate Congress' "informing function." The investigatory power has remained as an essential role of Congress.

The Constitution nowhere expressly grants to either House of Congress a general power to investigate in aid of legislation, or in aid of overseeing the Executive Branch. However, the Supreme Court has long recognized that such a power is implied as an essential concomitant to Congress's legislative authority. John E. Nowak and Ronald D. Rotunda, Constitutional Law (2004), 280. See McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135 (1927).

The investigative power of Congress has multiple purposes. "The ability to gather information has been regarded as a predicate to effective legislation and as important to providing a legislative check on executive actions. The Supreme Court has explained that Congress thus may conduct 'inquiries concerning the administration of existing laws as well as proposed or possibly needed statutes. It includes surveys of defects in our social, economic or political system for the purpose of enabling the Congress to remedy them.' The power to investigate also includes 'probes into departments of the Federal Government to expose corruption, inefficiency or waste'..... The authority to investigate necessarily requires the power to compel testimony." Erwin Chemerinsky, Constitutional Law (2006), 310. (Internal citations omitted).

It is difficult to imagine, to borrow Wilson's phrase, a more pressing "affair of government" than the question of whether a sitting president obtained his office illegally, and perhaps even by fraud. An investigating body must not prejudge the case. Its concern must be, first, to put the facts on the record and then to consider whatever legislation or other remedy might be appropriate in light of those facts.

The House of Representatives is an appropriate body to inquire into the facts and legal implications of a President's disputed eligibility for the office. The House itself has a contingent but potentially ...Continue reading here; http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/abbott/110227 

Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen w/Venn Diagram-14Feb2011 Wash Times Natl Wkly pg 5

41 comments:

  1. One point that needs to be addressed; "The Obama "Fight the Smears" website has published a digital photograph of a short-form "Certification of Live Birth" that they claim was issued by the Hawaiian Department of Health. There has been no evidence that Hawaii issued the document in either 2007 or in 2008.

    ReplyDelete
  2. more and more people are starting to speak out. about damn time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. HOW MANY MORE PEOPLE MUST SPEAK OUT BEFORE THE BIG QUESTION IS ANSWERED?

    ReplyDelete
  4. "When you are running for president everything should be public - including your full medical records. I believe in right to privacy, but when you're running for president, which is such an important job, the need of public to know to know supercedes it."
    Sen.Charles Schumer, 2008. NY.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Anonymous

    Senator Schumer: When you're running for President everything should be made public -

    Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3_hSnBvEHo

    ReplyDelete
  6. California Birther/Dualer/DoubterFebruary 28, 2011 at 10:22 PM

    Glad to see Professor Rice, whom I highly respect from watching him speak on programs aired by EWTN (Eternal Word Television Network), not get lily-livered on this issue like so many others who are in the public spotlight. As for Schumer, he might want to ask Barky what he meant when he said "Those who won't disclose the truth, are people who have something to hide."

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is a must read for Republican Congressman Issa who I believe will back down from any investigation regarding Obama eligibility. The Dems created an organization of big guns from the Clinton era to take on the Congressman and to make him tremble and be ineffective, there first move was personal smears on his background to include his teenage years and military service.

    ReplyDelete
  8. he cannot provide proof of citizenship as he has none. So why does our media not press the issue?. Why does the whole of Washington lay so apathetic to this flagrant breech of legality. Why has he spent so much of his own and others funds to cover this up and keep it secret?...( especially when he so boldy lied and said how "transparent" this adminsistration would be....it's transparent alright, so corrupt you can actually see the lies right through the cover up.) Get rid of this man who so wrongly calls himself "OUR" president.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I just wish the GOP would represent the people who elected them. All we want is the truth and they are more interested in being politically correct. Regardless of what we say or do in regards to this Usurper, we are racist. I am sick of the GOP taking a pass on this issue. If enough of us refuse to send money to the GOP, maybe they will grow some kahuna's and do their job.

    ReplyDelete
  10. PROFESSOR RICE: NATURAL BORN CITIZENS IS A PERSON BORN ON U.S.A. SOIL...HIS FATHER WAS UNDER THE BRITSH..SO I HAVE A PROBLEM, IF A ILLEGAL HAS A BABY ON OUR SOIL, THAT BABY IS A AMERICAN CITIZEN...OBAMA WAS BORN IN KENYA, PER HIS GRANDMOTHER SHE WAS THEIR..SO WHERE DOES THAT LEAVE OBAMA, HE IS AN ILLEGAL, LIVING THE LIFE LIKE ANY ILLEGAL, THAT IS ON THE BACKS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS, AND HE IS DOING A GOOD JOB AT THAT..IF WE SO NOT GET THE INFORMATION ''NOW'' ''WE THE PEOPLE'' ARE SCREWED, WE CAN NOT WAIT TILL 2012. GET IT.
    HE WILL DESTROY AMERICA, BEFORE 2012. TIME TO STAND UP, OR LAY DOWN A DIE? GOD BLESS ALL

    ReplyDelete
  11. @Anonymous
    "NATURAL BORN CITIZENS IS A PERSON BORN ON U.S.A. SOIL"

    No. A natural born citizen is born on US soil to a US citizen mother and a US citizen father.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I received an e-mail today from the Western Center for Journalism. It was well writted and laid out plenty or reasons why Obama should be impeached..and, of course, asked for donations.

    Here is my reply to their e-mail:

    Hello,

    Have you considered this as a reason why there are no calls from Congress for the impeachment of Obama?

    I cannot prove this, but it's why I believe we will never see Obama impeached, no matter how much he deserves it. He is "impeachment proof":

    All of Congress and the main stream media, including Fox News, know that Obama is a usurper of the presidency who was elected with lies, deceit, and massive election fraud. Congress and the media have, for more than two years, covered-up Obama's obvious ineligibility with more lies, ignoring of the Constitution. stonewalling and name calling. The reason for the media and Congress' action to continue the fraud and to protect Obama has changed, and it is now as much to protect themselves as to protect Obama. The media, since Obama was first presented as, "The One", has totally and completely failed to do it's job. There was zero investigative journalism looking into Obama's past, his sleazy friends, acquaintances and co-workers and "Who is Barack Obama?". He was given more than a free pass, the media are cheerleaders for Obama even today. Congress also failed miserably to vet Obama, and once they knew he was not Constitutionally qualified they insulted, stonewalled and sent BS form letters to their constituents, often saying Obama was a, "citizen", and rarely ever mentioning, "natural born Citizen. Congress, all of it, is actively involved in suppressing the ineligibility issue because, some more than others, they are actively involved in the biggest fraud/scam in political history. At this point the media and Congress are protecting themselves, maybe more so that Obama.

    Obama's ineligibility is protecting him from impeachment. In my opinion it would not be possible to impeach Obama without forcing the truth of, "Who is Barack Obama/Barry Soetoro?", to be revealed, which would implicate hundreds, if not thousands, of people in the charade that got Obama elected and is still going on today. Congress will not impeach Obama, ever, no matter what he does, because they fear jail time for many of their own.

    Please consider the above possibility.

    END


    Anybody agree Obama is impeachment proof, and not just because he is half-black?

    ReplyDelete
  13. @Anonymous
    Again, that makes no sense. There would be no reason for his personal documents to be made available to Congress in order for them to impeach him. Only the corruption and crimes he's committed since taking office would be relevant during impeachment trials.

    Further, his being half black isn't protecting him from impeachment, either.

    The reason he won't be impeached is because the Republicans took a beating from the libturds and their state run media when they impeached Bill Clinton. They know the beating will be worse the second time around. Being an even weaker party now than they were then, the Republican party just may not survive it again.

    ReplyDelete
  14. To Anonymous at 12:39 PM

    Sorry, but I refuse to believe there would be, even with Obama, a nice "clean" impeachment, for whatever reason, that would leave out any other issue except the one(s) specific to the impeachment, and include nothing about Obama's made-up past and questions about his eligibility.

    Perhaps it could, but I don't think so....

    Sorry it doesn't make sense to you, it is an opinion you know.

    I think the Republican Party could be American Heros if they had the nads to confront Obama.

    ReplyDelete
  15. How come nobody references Rep. Trent Frank's own investigation that found that he was in fact born in Hawaii?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Which investigation and based on what?

    Being no long-form bc, or any other records, have been released by Obama it would be a bit a hard to come to that conclusion.

    It is also hard to come to that conclusion by an image of a COLB posted on the internet. Which the same type COLBs were also issued to children not born in Hawaii, which, by the way, would have also triggered the newspaper announcement.

    Or was it based on the CRS report that admits Obama was never vetted?

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/11/breaking-members-of-congress-internal.html

    ReplyDelete
  17. It's all bull squat. The Repubs have no balls, never did, never will. They are just the otherside that says they will do things differently than the Dems and take yor money. Notice how hard thay are trying to keep the Tea Party folks at an arms length. The Tea Party folks haven't raised or started an investigation. They are now the third party that takes you donations and votes and does nothing. Hey Rand Paul and daddy Paul maybe the two of you collectively have a pair of balls and could go after Obama's eligibility.

    ReplyDelete
  18. We do have the Truth, in form of tangible PROOF. He's admitted ineligibility, and such admission was filed in County Court, and in Federal Court.

    Does one not have an eye to see?

    www.scribd.com/sconnerat

    ReplyDelete
  19. To be the President of the USA, the Constitution of the United States indicates clearly that the POTUSA must be "a natural born citizen". To be a natural born citizen, the POTUSA MUST meet the following 2 conditions:
    1) The POTUSA must be an American citizen who was born in the USA.
    AND
    2) The POTUSA must be born of two parents who are American citizens.
    Both conditions are required! 2) is NOT met, as Obama's father was NEVER EVER an American.
    Conclusion: Obama is NOT eligible to be POTUSA!


    2 sites where there are useful information on this lack of eligibility of Obama to be president of the USA:
    1) Attorney Mario Apuzzo's site at puzo1 blogspot com.
    2) Several articles on WorldNetDaily at wnd com under “Is Obama constitutionally eligible to serve?”

    Use google com to find the exact web addresses of these 2 web sites.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Somebody tell Prof. Rice that he needed to have weighed in three years ago when I was first reporting on it.

    It is not "Obama's eligibility could be biggest political fraud in the history of the world" - it is Obama's identity fraud that is the greatest in the history of the world.

    One more thing: what is posted on Obama's website is not a "digital photograph" but a 2nd generation copy of a Photoshop fake, "digital scan" of something that does not exist.

    http://is.gd/pipago

    ReplyDelete
  21. The Media, Congress, Senate, Supreme Court, Council on Foreign Nations, All elected officials, The States,The Military are ALL protecting Obama's criminal act's Treason and Fraud.
    That make's them ALL criminals.
    Without intervention, the Country is finished, God help us because none of the above have or will. Coward's and Criminal's all. May they all feel the Sword of Islam! Then burn in Hell forever for their non-action.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Forget about the birth certificate. The best way to clear the entire affair up is to investigate his fraudulent use of a SSN from a deceased person in CT. The documentation is already in the public domain, it's easy to prove and there are laws and standing is not an issue.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Any person running for office who comes out and makes the idiotic "clarifying" statement of ... I believe BO was born in Hawaii... and then goes on to question something else about this issue - should be NONexistant to all of us - we do not see them or hear them they do not exist - they are cowards, have been cowards and will forever more be cowards.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Considering that communicating with our elected officials via e-mail and the internet has only served to reduce constituency concerns to SPAM, I believe a more traditional way of communicating may effect a response from this group that otherwise seems to have forgotten ( or never really knew ) why their overpaid selves are in Washington.

    Take it upon yourselves, Mr. and Mrs. America,
    and use good ol' snail mail to let your favorite politician know that you are thinking about them, and do it often. We all love letters from home.

    Post cards can be purchased and sent at a reduced rate of postage.

    Now, I like to think big. 1,000,000 post cards per WEEK arriving in Washington, will if nothing else get the postmaster's attention. I am certain that 1,000,000 per DAY would at minimum bring about the formation of a steering committee to do a focus study and see if a Special Subcommittee should be convened to see if a Czar may need to be appointed to make sense of it all.

    10,000,000 per week will sober them up! 10,000,000 per day OR MORE and they WILL be hearing us!

    I am doing it. I challenge you to do it too. Tell to people that you know and convince them to do it also and don't stop come hell or high water until they start to work for us like they are supposed to be doing.

    I AM NOT SPAM and I simply refuse to be deleted!
    No other country is coming to our rescue. If we want to be saved, we have to save ourselves. I don't think for one second that we can't!

    ReplyDelete
  25. @Anonymous

    I am a little late to this controversy. Thanks to The Donald for making me take a closer look at it.

    When I try to plug in Obama’s info and alleged SS number, 042684425, into the Selective Service System website at sss.gov it gives me:

    “Error.
    Sorry, your request cannot be processed at this time because you have exceeded the daily limit for the verification of these credentials.
    (4/16/2011 5:36:11 PM)”

    Either the site has already been scrubbed or there are too many queries.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Too many people are searching it... Try doing it in a day or so and do it after midnight...

    ReplyDelete
  27. Politicians can become president. Only leaders can effectively serve as Commander-in-Chief.

    Teenagers and young adults who proudly done uniforms of our armed forces, fight our wars, and many who return from battle crippled or dead, have far more integrity than Obama.

    See The Military's Moral Dilemma article at World Net Daily.
    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=117857

    ReplyDelete
  28. No document before Obama's official and legal adoption by Lolo Soetoro of Indonesia matters or is relevant. Whether it is the truth or not, such as a fake fraudulent COLB or any other questionable document that may now appear, they mean nothing, nothing at all. For those old records and documents are sealed and meaningless, Trumped by Hawaii’s and International Adoption Laws, as in most states when Obama became Lolo Soetoro’s adopted son in Honolulu Hawaii and relocated to his father’s home country of Indonesia and there became a Muslum and an Indonesian citizen like his father.

    Wait, as Joe the plumber asked it’s the redistribution of Obama. Because no sane mother would or has any legal right to ever change their children’s names like Maya or Barry to a penniless deceased, divorced bigamist and polygamist X husband’s last name to Barack Hessian Obama Sr. of Kenya, ex post facto and is prohibited and never recorded.

    So, the only logical and legal question left is! When did Barry Soetoro of Indonesia change his name to Barack Hessian Obama Jr., II or to whatever legally, in the United States of America?

    Whether Barry Soetoro did or did not legally change his advertising stage or stooge name and campaign slogans to the Africanized name change of Barack Hessian Obama for votes, there is no known record by the U. S. State Department to confirm it. Barry Soetoro aka Obama still remains an Indonesian citizen here illegally, unless Hillary Clinton as Security of State confirms, denies or approves that Obama is a citizen only.

    The Naturalization Act of the Constitution also includes a very important limitation and caveat:
    The THIRD CONGRESS in 1795 states, "...children of citizens [plural = both parents] of the United States...shall be considered citizens of the United States; Provided That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons, whose fathers have never been resident in the United States..." (THIRD CONGRESS Session II. Ch.21. 1795, Approved January 29, 1795, pp. 414-415. Document margin note: "How children shall obtain citizenship through their parents" Document margin note: "Former Act repealed 1790 ch.3.")
    Kenya has never been a U.S. possession or state; well maybe in one of the 51-57 states of confusion and delusion, Obama said and claimed exists publicly, periodically.

    Obama is a sad pathetic public spectacle and disgrace according to law, such as: Article II - The Executive Branch Section 1 – The President: “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” No one can claim and maintain Barry Soetoro aka Obama has any right or is a legal U.S. citizen eligible to be a U.S. President by law and the facts as known!

    Admittedly and fundamentally Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro of Indonesia, when his mother and father changed his name to Barry Soetoro upon adoption, divorce and passport records, one step beyond a marriage license.

    Adoption Laws, as in most states when Obama became Lolo Soetoro’s adopted son in Honolulu Hawaii and relocated to his father’s home country of Indonesia and there became a Muslum and an Indonesian citizen like his father.

    This begs the repeat question! Why would Mrs. Ann Soetoro ever change her two children’s names to a divorced-penniless polygamist and bigamist name of deceased Barack Hessian Obama Sr. when she unwittingly married into a multiple marriage Muslum group’s name making Obama ‘s name and use of it null and void? Obama had to assume his mother’s maiden name as recorded and keep his adopted name of Barry Soetoro, unless he was readopted by a d ead Hawaiian COLBerist? LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Im with Orly Taitz on this. You cannot impeach a man who has fraudulently aquired a federal office. This is usurpation, and he never legally held the power of that office. It is a fraud. You cannot impeach him. The court precedent comes out of North Dakota, where the governor was removed from office after the state Supreme Court determined he did not meet the state constitution's eligibility requirements. The same shoe is on Obama's foot.

    ReplyDelete
  30. ‎44% of the people killed on 9/11 were in direct competetion with the Chicago Climate Exchange,,,Obama/Al Gore/Maurice Strong/Richard Sandor..and the CO2 carbon calulator invented by Carlton Bartels who was killed on 9/11 (opps) was given t......o Frank Raines of FM/FM...Obama and his Shitcago Crew...William Ayers and Beradine Dorn, etc..pu...lled off 9/11 to pass cap & trade and shove all that green energy crap down our throats..Why doesn't someone ask O where he was and 9/11 and why his brother-in-law was in the WTC 5 days before 9/11 working on the sprinklers systems that failed??? or how did we get a totally unknown/undocumented Arab/Muslim senator from Chicago with ties to every known criminal ground in the world intent on destroying the USA in our WH????See More

    ReplyDelete
  31. Congress, CEO's, banks, union leaders, muslims, blacks, elite, etc......, are all being paid off to lie. They love money more than "We the People," and have sold us down the river, raped and stolen America's wealth. In the movie BRAVEHEART, the british king had paid off all the irish nobles with gold and land so they will not fight for FREEDOM! The Spirit of God has left America to defend for itself and henceforth the debil himself, bama, has arrived Eph 6:12, " For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high [places]." The END TIMES are upon us! We can either march in the millions upon Washington DC, or repent and become born again.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Every person in this country, when they apply for a job, have to show a BIRTH CERTIFICATE and a SOCIAL SECURITY CARD. No copies, must be original.

    So the guy flipping burgers at Mcdonalds has to establish his identity before we let him use a spatula, but the man who sits in the most important government position of the most powerful nation on earth, doesn't???

    If anyone in the government can look me or anyone else in the eye and agree that this is right....

    WE SHOULD ALL LEAVE THIS COUNTRY NOW..... BECAUSE EVERYTHING THIS COUNTRY PRETENDS TO STAND FOR IS DEAD!

    ReplyDelete
  33. If Congress does not investigate ASAP, Democrats will not have the facts needed for a rational informed decision whether they want to re-nominate Obama. Caucuses and primaries are hard upon us.

    Investigation of Obama's real eligibility problem, his probable loss of American citizenship in the course of acquiring and exercising Indonesian citizenship, will take a great deal of time and manpower.

    If we keep piddling around, it will be too late to investigate.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Obama's real, original birth certificate, confirmed by DNA analysis, will prove that Obama is not half black in the sense of having a Negro birth father. That's why he won't release it.

    He is most likely the son of Stanley Armour Dunham, a Caucasian pale item, and a native Hawai'ian wahine.

    Unfortunately, the demented and deluded RINOs in the House think he's half African, so they cower from the prospect of investigating him, although the first step in the investigation - subpoenae of vital records and DNA - will prove Obama is not half African.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Whether Lolo Soetoro formally adopted Obama or not is merely one factor in the determination whether Obama lost his American citizenship in the course of acquiring and exercising his Indonesian citizenship.

    Nothing will come of all this speculation unless and until official investigation finds the facts and acts upon them.

    If investigation does not occur very soon, Obama will fool us again.

    ReplyDelete
  36. This must have been what it was like as Hitler, Castro and Chavez trampled their Constitutions.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Total fraud by both parties. He was never properly vetted in 2008 by the democratic party in the primaries and he is not being properly vetted in 2012. People he was never vetted period! Orly Taitz who is at the forefront of this constitutional question has exposed just how far the political process is corrupted, from the election judges in each and every state, state judges, federal judges and all of congress.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Eligibility issue is National Security risk issue, Obama must be removed immediately.
    The 25th Amendment Section 4 was written to remove a sitting president ...USE IT!

    ReplyDelete
  39. The problem with suggestion of Anonymous, like mine and Dr. Rice’s, is that it requires action by American officials frozen in the ice of their own indifference, fear, and actual meretricious complicity in the Obama scheme. For example, it appears that the Romney campaign and the RINOs are relying on a corrupt deal with Obama to refrain from an exhaustive official investigation of Obama, including his loss of American citizenship in 1981 through foreign naturalization to evade criminal liability for failing to register with the Selective Service System in 1979, and other meretricious and subversive purposes.

    Besides profound stupidity, want of perception and ignorance result in a judgment call that Obama is just another politician, and investigation would uncover nothing of great importance. From this fatally flawed judgment comes inaction, a refusal even to inquire, which magnifies the ignorance and groundless foolish speculation, which reinforces the original judgment call that the actual facts are not worth finding. A vicious cycle. Precious few realize that this puts the country in existential danger.

    I think I can add crucial evidence to accumulating clues that Obama lost U.S. citizenship in 1981. This will involve a protracted tour around the world, focusing primarily on Obama’s adult ratification and confirmation, as an adult, of his Indonesian naturalization, with its renunciation of all other citizenships, and the corrupt bargain between Obama and Indonesian President SBY to conceal evidence of it.

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.