U.S. Attorney's Office Illegally Representing Obama
As reported here the U.S. Attorneys representing Obama in the Grinols v. Electoral College case filed their opposition to Taitz's motion for a temporary restraining order to stop the electoral count. The U.S. Attorneys also filed a motion to extend time for responding to the numerous subpoenas issued by Taitz. Yesterday, Taitz filed her reply to Obama's opposition and also filed a motion to strike and a motion for contempt of court against Obama. The hearing is scheduled for January 3rd, 2013. - EXCERPTS:
REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
Most of the argument and precedents provided by the defense are irrelevant in this case, as those precedents relate to generalized grievances of ordinary citizens. The case at hand was brought by Presidential electors, who were duly elected by their parties and by the Presidential candidates. Their grievances are clearly particularized. Additionally, defendants are bringing a number of precedents and arguments in relation to several cases, which were brought after Obama took office in 2008, which is obviously not the case here, as he will not take office until January 20, 2013.
Due to particularized injury to Presidential electors and Presidential candidates and due to impending January 4 confirmation by Congress and January 20, 2013 swearing in of Obama, the issue is not moot, and it is ripe, as injury to the Plaintiffs is imminent. Plaintiffs assert that elections fraud committed by Obama affected their fundamental voting civil rights.[...]
REPLY TO TRO CONTINUED IN SCRIBD DOC BELOW...
MOTION TO STRIKE AN ANSWER FILED BY THE U.S. ATTORNEY ON BEHALF OF A PRIVATE PARTY CANDIDATE FOR OFFICE BARACK OBAMA AND MOTION FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT ORDER BY DEFENDANT OBAMA
Defendant Obama is in contempt of the court order to respond by the December 26 deadline Defendant Obama was served in his capacity as a candidate for office, a candidate for the U.S. President. He was specifically sued as a candidate and not the U.S. President. U.S. attorney's office has no right to represent him, as it would constitute an embezzlement of taxpayer funds and a conflict of interests.
The service of process on candidate Obama was done through the U.S. Attorney's office as Obama refuses to accept mail at his residence and demands all pleadings to be filed through the U.S. attorney's office. In similar actions filed recently U.S. attorney’s office refused to represent Candidate Obama and Obama hired private attorneys. [...]
Second of all, there is a clear conflict of interests between Obama and the Federal defendants, who are represented by the U.S. attorney's office as well, specifically due to the fact that evidence in the case shows Obama to be a foreign national, who is attempting to usurp the U.S. Presidency by using forged IDs and a fraudulently obtained Social Security number. as such his interests are opposite to the interests of the Federal defendants. [...]
Based on the conflict of interest, Barack Obama who is sued as a candidate was supposed to have a separate private representation. [...]
BOTH MOTION TO STRIKE/CONTEMPT & REPLY TO OPPOSITION BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/118353801
CASE DETAILS: California Judge Sets Hearing For TRO Enjoining Congress From Certifying Obama’s Votes - CLICK HERE.
Grinols et al v Electoral College et al - Reply To Opposition To TRO/Motion To Strike - California Electora...
WATCH SHERIFF OBAMA INVESTIGATION PRESS CONFERENCE HERE: CLICK HERE.
-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
New Ad - AZ Sheriff Arpaio - Obama Birth Cert & Draft Reg Card Are Forged! Wash Times Natl Wkly - 12 Ma...